Jimmy Kimmel on the Facebook papers: ‘Are we surprised by this?’ | Late-night TV roundup – Whistleblowers, PR Nightmares, and Papers Oh My!

What is the Facebook Papers project?: Everything you need to know - FOX 5 DC

Table of Contents

Late-night TV roundup – Whistleblowers, PR Nightmares, and Papers Oh My!

Jimmy Kimmel

Jimmy Kimmel reacted to the release of the so-called Facebook papers on Monday evening – a trove of documents, published by 17 US news organizations, which detail the company’s own knowledge of its threats to democracy.

“Are we surprised by this? Finding out ‘What did Facebook know?’” Kimmel wondered with faux shock. “Let me clear it up for you, what Facebook knows: they know everything.

“They know your social security number, they know where you live, they know what you’re having for lunch, they know the winners of the next five Super Bowls,” he added.

“But we can’t stop, because we have to monitor the weight of our former love interests,” he joked.

Stephen Colbert

“All of the news today is stuff we already know: Facebook is evil, global warming is real, Republican officials helped plan the coup, Pop-Tarts contain no fruit,” said Stephen Colbert at the top of Monday’s Late Show.

But as the host is “contractually obligated to be surprised about what’s happening in the world,” Colbert feigned shock at record-setting rain in the west, just a week after the governor of California declared a drought emergency. San Francisco had the fourth wettest day in its history; Sacramento saw the most amount of rainfall in a day since 1880.

The historic rain was caused by an offshore storm system known as a “bomb cyclone” – “because that’s what weather is now, just a combination of terrible things,” Colbert said. “So get ready for next week’s forecast of Murder Typhoon, Stab-icanes, and the rest of the week is Floods That Try to Explain Bitcoin to You.”

In other news, Monday was a “monumentally bad day for Facebook, the world’s top social media network and uncle-radicalizer,” Colbert continued, with the release of the Facebook papers.

The stories outline how coordinated groups sow violence and discord on Facebook, including with the 6 January insurrection. “That’s in addition to the discord your cousin sows on Facebook by announcing she’s named her twins Dash and Otter,” Colbert joked.

Trevor Noah

On The Daily Show, Trevor Noah mourned the loss of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, who was accidentally shot and killed when a prop gun handled by Alec Baldwin misfired on the set of the movie Rust. “Maybe I’m an idiot, but I don’t get this: why do they need real guns to make a fake thing?” Noah wondered. “Because Hollywood movies love using the fake version of real things for everything, except guns.

“Like in Hollywood they’ve got fake everything – fake tigers, fake houses, fake diversity and inclusion initiatives,” he continued. “But then when it comes to deadly weapons, suddenly they’re like ‘let’s get a real gun and see what happens.’”

“It makes no sense to me: live gunfire is something that should’ve been phased out movies a long time ago, like black face,” he added. “But I guess Hollywood has a history of moving slowly on innovation. I mean, shit, it was only a few years ago that they found out women could be over 33.”

“What makes this story even worse is that usually, there are a lot of safety measures in place to make sure that this kind of thing doesn’t happen.” According to numerous Hollywood prop and weapons experts, there should never be live rounds on set, and no gun should ever be pointed at another person.

But reports have revealed that safety concerns, including several previous misfires by the prop gun in question, led several crew members to walk off the set the morning of the accident. According to the LA Times, a crew member texted the unit production manager warning “we’ve now had three accidental discharges. This is super unsafe.” The prop master on set had recently said on a podcast that she was intimidated and inexperienced with loading blank rounds.

“If you don’t have the budget to pay for gun safety for your gun movie, then maybe you shouldn’t be making a gun movie,” Noah said. “Make a different movie.”

Seth Meyers

Seth Meyers discussed a bombshell report from Rolling Stone that organizers of the 6 January insurrection participated in “dozens” of meetings with GOP members of Congress and White House staff in the days leading up to the riot.

According to the magazine, Republican lawmakers including Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Paul Gosar of Arizona, and Lauren Boebert of Colorado promised organizers a “blanket pardon” for the protest held to oppose Mike Pence’s symbolic certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

“‘Blanket pardon’ sounds like the kind of made-up fake legal things these doofuses would say,” the Late Night host said. “It’s a weird feature of our politics that the most sinister characters are also the biggest morons.”

“It’s getting harder and harder to articulate just how unhinged the right has become,” he added. “They’re now claiming they’re vindicated by everything from secret sources inside fake CIA fraud departments, to proof in voter fraud found in empty parking lots,” as Mike Lindell said on Steve Bannon’s podcast. “They’re not going to stop.”

From our friends at: www.theguardian.com

Facebook tries to turn the page

Facebook, for its part, has consistently tried to challenge Haugen and stated her testament and reports on the documents mischaracterize its efforts and actions.
“At the heart of these stories is a property which is incorrect,” a Facebook spokesperson stated in a declaration to CNN. “Yes, we’re an organization and we earn a profit, however the concept that we do so at the expenditure of people’s safety or wellness misunderstands where our own commercial interests lie.”
In a tweet thread recently, the company’s Vice President of Communications, John Pinette, called the Facebook Papers a “curated selection out of millions of documents at Facebook” which “can in no method be utilized to draw reasonable conclusions about us.” Even that response is informing—- if Facebook has more files that would tell a fuller story, why not release them? (During her Senate testament Facebook’s Davis stated Facebook is “trying to find ways to launch more research study.”).
A chest of internal Facebook files dripped by whistleblower Frances Haugen has kicked off a wave of coverage of the company, starting with the Wall Street Journal’s “Facebook Files” and now as a consortium of other news organizations present stories on the same documents.
A chest of internal Facebook documents dripped by whistleblower Frances Haugen has begun a wave of coverage of the business, beginning with the Wall Street Journal’s “Facebook Files” and now as a consortium of other wire service roll out stories on the exact same documents.
Rather, Facebook is now supposedly planning to rebrand itself under a brand-new name as early as today, as the wave of important protection continues. (Facebook previously decreased to talk about this report.) The move seems a clear effort to turn the page, but a fresh coat of paint won’t repair the underlying issues detailed in the documents– only Facebook, or whatever it might quickly be called, can do that.
Take the example of a report published by the Journal on September 16 that highlighted internal Facebook research study about a violent Mexican drug cartel, understood as Cartél Jalisco Nueva Generación. The cartel was stated to be utilizing the platform to publish violent material and hire brand-new members using the acronym “CJNG,” even though it had actually been designated internally as one of the “Dangerous People and Organizations” whose content ought to be eliminated. Facebook told the Journal at the time that it was purchasing expert system to reinforce its enforcement versus such groups.
Regardless of the Journal’s report last month, CNN recently determined disturbing content linked to the group on Instagram, including images of weapons, and photo and video posts in which people appear to have been shot or beheaded. After CNN asked Facebook about the posts, a representative verified that multiple videos CNN flagged were eliminated for breaching the company’s policies, and a minimum of one post had a warning added.

Facebook knew it was being utilized to incite violence in Ethiopia. It did little to stop the spread, files show.

Haugen has suggested Facebook’s failure to repair such issues remains in part due to the fact that it prioritizes profit over social excellent, and, in some cases, because the business lacks the capacity to put out its numerous fires at once.
” Facebook is very very finely staffed … and this is since there are a lot of technologists that take a look at what Facebook has done and their hesitation to accept obligation, and people just aren’t ready to work there,” Haugen said in an instruction with the “Facebook Papers” consortium last week. “So they need to make really, very, very intentional options on what does or does not get accomplished.”.
Facebook has invested a total of $13 billion since 2016 to enhance the security of its platforms, according to the business representative. (By comparison, the business’s annual income topped $85 billion last year and its earnings struck $29 billion.) The spokesperson likewise said Facebook has “40,000 individuals dealing with the safety and security on our platform, including 15,000 individuals who review content in more than 70 languages working in more than 20 places all across the world to support our community.”.
” We have actually also taken down over 150 networks looking for to control public argument because 2017, and they have come from over 50 nations, with the bulk coming from or focused beyond the United States,” the representative said. “Our track record reveals that we crackdown on abuse outside the United States with the exact same intensity that we apply in the US.”.
Still, the documents suggest that the business has far more work to do to eliminate all of the many harms detailed in the documents and to attend to the unexpected consequences of Facebook’s unprecedented reach and integration into our daily lives.

How Facebook Is Attempting To Maintain Users.

Facebook executives recently confessed that more youthful teens are abandoning the website for more recent mobile messaging and social sharing apps, while a research study from earlier this year discovered that the social network lost 11 million active users overall in the U.S. and Britain. Here are some choices Facebook is considering to keep its existing users and recover those who have defected:.

Zuckerberg’s public claims typically contrast with internal research.

Haugen referrals Zuckerberg’s public statements at least 20 times in her SEC problems, asserting that the CEO’s distinct degree of control over Facebook forces him to bear supreme responsibility for a list of societal damages triggered by the company’s relentless pursuit of development.

The documents likewise reveal that Zuckerberg’s public statements are typically at odds with internal company findings.

Zuckerberg testified last year before Congress that the business gets rid of 94 percent of the hate speech it finds. In internal documents, researchers estimated that the company was removing less than 5 percent of all hate speech on Facebook.

Facebook spokeswoman Dani Lever denied that Zuckerberg “makes choices that cause harm” and dismissed the findings, stating they are “based on picked files that are mischaracterized and without any context.”.

It isn’t clear whether the SEC is examining Facebook or whether it would see enough product in the disclosures to necessitate an investigation of whether the company could have deceived investors. The SEC declined to comment. The commission isn’t needed to take any action on whistleblowers’ suggestions, and when it carries out investigations, it does so on a confidential basis as a matter of policy. In a yearly report, the SEC stated it received over 6,900 whistleblower pointers in the ending September 2020.

Numerous securities law professionals said it wouldn’t be simple to show misbehavior.

” Regulators like clean cases and they like where someone is on tape doing something incorrect,” said Joshua Mitts, a securities law professor at Columbia University. Haugen’s claims are hardly a “clean case,” he stated.

Facebook pushback.

Facebook’s public relations chief recently stated Haugen’s disclosures were an “orchestrated ‘gotcha’ campaign” directed by her public relations advisers.

” A curated choice out of millions of documents at Facebook can in no chance be used to draw reasonable conclusions about us,” Facebook’s vice president for communications, John Pinette, said in a tweet ahead of the release of the Haugen disclosures.

” Internally, we share work in progress and debate choices. Not every idea withstands the examination we must use to decisions impacting many people,” Pinette said.

Haugen has gotten aid from knowledgeable legal representatives and public relations advisers. A company run by Costs Burton, an Obama White House representative, is managing media demands, and Haugen is represented by legal representatives from Whistleblower Help, a not-for-profit company.

The disclosures made by Haugen’s lawyers show a roiling internal debate at Facebook at the exact same time it has been in a harsh external spotlight, with congressional hearings, privacy investigations, antitrust suits, and other examination by outsiders.

And the upheaval may show a larger threat than any external examination due to the fact that Facebook relies for its success on being able to draw in and keep a few of the world’s leading software application engineers and technologists. If the company can’t draw in, maintain and encourage skilled workers, it could lose its capability to compete successfully, it stated in its latest yearly report in January.

A Facebook employee wrote on an internal message board on Jan. 6: “We have been handling concerns we can’t address from our buddies, household, and market coworkers for several years. Hiring, in specific, has gotten harder throughout the years as Facebook’s ethical track record continues to deteriorate (all while our technical track record continues to increase).”.

Facebook stated in a declaration that 83 percent of its employees say they ‘d suggest it as a fantastic place to work which it has employed more workers this year than in any previous year.

Causing ‘social-civil war’.
Another set of Haugen’s files describes how the computer system algorithm behind Facebook’s news feed– the formula that determines what posts individuals see and in which order– resulted in unintentional repercussions over months and years.

Facebook announced that it would reword the algorithm in January 2018, stating it would emphasize “significant social interactions” and give more weight to remarks, reactions, and re-shares amongst buddies, instead of posts from brands and services.

By the next year, the changes had reverberated throughout European politics.

Facebook was responsible for a “social-civil war” in online political discourse in Poland, the individual stated, passing on an expression from discussions with political operatives there. (The Facebook staff member does not name the political celebrations or the operatives involved in the “social-civil war” or what issues were at the leading edge. Extremist political celebrations in numerous nations commemorated the method the brand-new algorithm rewarded their “justification strategies” for subjects such as immigration, the Facebook worker composed.

Studying the impact of the algorithm modification ended up being a concern for many economists, statisticians, and others who work at Facebook studying the platform, the files reveal. A research study published internally in December 2019 stated Facebook’s algorithms “are not neutral” but instead value content that will get a response, any response, with the result that “outrage and misinformation are most likely to be viral.”

” We understand that lots of things that generate engagement on our platform leave users divided and depressed,” composed the researcher, whose name was redacted.

Potential effects.
Some securities law professionals said claims like Haugen’s would not necessarily set off an SEC investigation.

” Do they truly go to the core of what the SEC is required to police?” asked Charles Clark, a previous assistant director of the SEC’s enforcement department, who said parts of the allegations didn’t appear to clearly breach securities law. “A few of what she’s grumbling about is very important to Congress and is very important to the world at big however isn’t really tied to the required of the SEC.”

Clark included, nevertheless, that a person of Haugen’s claims– that Facebook is potentially inflating user counts and other metrics important to marketers– “is the type of matter that the SEC has actually focused on for several years.”

Securities law professionals likewise do not dismiss how the SEC may react. Harvey Pitt, a former SEC chair, said that he thinks Haugen’s allegations are reliable and that the commission should examine whether Facebook satisfied its legal commitments in making disclosures to financiers.

Even that reaction is informing—- if Facebook has more documents that would tell a fuller story, why not release them? (Throughout her Senate testament Facebook’s Davis said Facebook is “looking for ways to release more research study.”).
The move appears to be a clear attempt to turn the page, but a fresh coat of paint will not fix the underlying problems detailed in the documents– just Facebook, or whatever it may quickly be called, can do that.
The representative also stated Facebook has “40,000 individuals working on the safety and security on our platform, including 15,000 people who review content in more than 70 languages working in more than 20 locations all across the world to support our neighborhood.”.

Facebook was accountable for a “social-civil war” in online political discourse in Poland, the individual stated, passing on a phrase from discussions with political operatives there.

facebook is in trouble

There is so much more to come involving the Facebook papers, the whistleblower, and the public relations nightmare that now involves the integrity of the democracy of the United States of America. You can be certain that facebook is just too big to fail. They always find a way out of any trouble they seem to get into. I think we need to start looking at why that is.

Please leave a like and share if you found this article enjoyable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on reddit